Congratulations Wimbeldon, your turn this season, after our success last year. Fingers crossed that Chelmsford can follow you in a similar way you followed us last season. PS; The welcome the City fans had at Wimbledon in January was great, just a shame so many of both sets of supporters were locked out. Must have been a first for the Conference South.
We now have two massive home games to show our support for what the team has done, starting tomorrow ... MORE >>
By amber646 on Thu, 11th March 10
| BlueSq South Standings | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newport County | 82 |
| 2 | Chelmsford | 58 |
| 3 | Bath City | 55 |
| 4 | Braintree Town | 55 |
| 5 | Staines Town | 54 |
| 6 | Eastleigh | 52 |
| 7 | Thurrock | 50 |
| 8 | Dover | 50 |
| 9 | St Albans | 48 |
| 10 | Welling United | 47 |
| Full standings | ||
Posted 22/06/2009 @ 09:57
The problem with H&R is that it's a small club, small badly segreated ground, a small support base, and unles it does something drastic to teh stadium, it;s goingt ihave mjor problems if or when they ever get promoted to the Conference national. Unfortunately a lot of clubs are in a similar position withgod teams but with stadiums that let them down, and also in the case of H&R Poor quality and heavy handed stewards who are simply not qualified to do their job properly. It's no good getting "doormen" to steward a football ground, they have no idea how to handle a sports crowd, especially when another club brings far more fans to hampton than the home club can muster. The fans at Hampton (except in one or two cases) are great, it's their security officials who let the club down. By all accounts thee were considerable problems there in the play off game against Hayes. with lots off local Brentford & QPR fans backing the away club. If they can't handle that properly what hope would they have against the fans of clubs like Luton Town etc, if they had been promoted ?